From Nuremberg to Now: Why Is the U.S. Letting Russia Repeat Nazi War Crimes?
By Ihor Rosomakha
March 15, 2025
The Trump-Rubio administration has quietly terminated funding for efforts to track and rescue Ukrainian children abducted by Russia, despite mounting evidence that thousands remain unlawfully detained in Russian-controlled territories. This decision not only weakens international accountability for war crimes but also signals a dangerous shift in U.S. foreign policy—one that prioritizes appeasement over justice.
From Nazi Crimes to Russian War Crimes
The forced abduction of children during wartime is not a new crime. It was a defining charge in the RuSHA Trial, one of the Nuremberg Trials following World War II, where Nazi officials were convicted for kidnapping children from occupied territories, erasing their identities, and forcibly Germanizing them. The United States, along with the international community, recognized such actions as war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Yet today, Russia is following the same playbook. Since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has forcibly deported more than 20,000 Ukrainian children to Russian-controlled areas under the guise of "humanitarian evacuations," according to the United Nations. Many of these children have been placed in Russian foster homes, given new identities, and subjected to state-run reeducation programs designed to erase their Ukrainian heritage.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has already indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, for orchestrating this mass abduction. Investigative work by Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab—previously funded by the U.S. State Department—was instrumental in gathering evidence used in these charges. But now, that support is gone.
Trump-Rubio Administration’s Retreat from Accountability
The Trump-Rubio administration has ended funding for Yale’s research, effectively halting the program that was tracking abducted children through satellite imagery and biometric analysis. This move follows the State Department's cancellation of a related intelligence-sharing contract with Europol and the ICC, significantly hampering efforts to hold Russia accountable.
The official explanation? Secretary of State J.D. Vance claims that diplomatic priorities outweigh investigative spending. But critics see a clear pattern of appeasement. David Scheffer, former U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes, called it a blatant retreat from justice, arguing that the same administration that claims to uphold law and order is now shielding war criminals from prosecution.
What If These Were American Children?
The United States has long made it clear that the abduction of American children by a foreign power would be a red line. If even a handful of American children were kidnapped, the government would deploy every available asset—military, diplomatic, and intelligence—to bring them home.
Yet when it comes to Ukrainian children, the response has been starkly different. There have been no new sanctions, no diplomatic demands for repatriation, and no sustained efforts to track the missing children. Instead, the administration has chosen to weaken international efforts to hold Russia accountable, signaling that some victims of war crimes matter more than others.
A Broader Shift Toward Russian Interests?
This decision is part of a troubling pattern. The Trump-Rubio administration recently brokered a 30-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, yet made no firm demands for the return of kidnapped Ukrainian children. U.S. military support to Ukraine was suspended for weeks before resuming under reduced terms. Intelligence sharing with European allies on Ukrainian war crimes investigations has been scaled back.
Ukraine’s Minister for Reintegration, Iryna Vereshchuk, stated that this is not just diplomatic strategy—it is complicity in a crime.
The Stakes for U.S. Credibility
The Nuremberg Trials set a precedent: the forced abduction and reprogramming of children is a war crime. The United States once led the charge in prosecuting these atrocities. Now, under the Trump-Rubio administration, it risks becoming complicit by inaction.
By abandoning one of the most effective efforts to document and expose Russia’s crimes, the U.S. sends a clear message that justice is negotiable. That war crimes can be tolerated when politically convenient. That some children are worth saving, while others are not.
History Will Judge Us
This is more than a policy failure—it is a moral failure. When America turns a blind eye to war crimes, it weakens its credibility, emboldens its enemies, and betrays its founding principles. If we accept this today, what happens when the next aggressor tests our resolve? What happens when it’s American children being taken?
If we abandon justice now, history will not judge us kindly. Future generations will ask why we stood by while children were stolen from their families, their identities erased. America has a choice: to stand for what is right or to let history repeat itself.
